This is an AI-generated visualization built for internal review, not an official University of Illinois publication. Descriptions are paraphrased summaries of each instructor's own submission, not verbatim excerpts. Compiled from thirty-four AI Integration Design Documents submitted to Summer AI Studio, July–August 2026, University of Illinois Urbana–Champaign.
AI Integration Strategies
Project index
Early feedback
Thirty Summer AI Studio participants rated the overall quality of the program's two halves: two weeks of in-person training, followed by three weeks of individual project work. Both halves scored well. Nobody rated either half "poor" or "very poor," and only a few rated either half merely "fair" (1 for the training weeks, 2 for the project weeks).
The gap between the two means comes mostly from a "good" vs. "excellent" split: the in-person training pulled a slightly stronger share of top marks (15 of 30 "excellent"), while the individual project weeks skewed a bit more toward "good" than "excellent" (16 and 12).
Source: Q11 of the Summer AI Studio participant survey, "Please rate the overall quality of the two parts of the Summer AI Studio," n = 30.